Risks and opportunities related to climate change

In light of proposals by the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), OSAKA SODA has decided on the following governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.

Governance

Osaka Soda established a Sustainability Committee to receive and oversee reports on climate change. This committee also formulates sustainability policies, strategies, and measures for various departments, monitors the state of KPI achievement related to initiatives and the materiality defined in the SDGs, and regularly submits reports and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors.

Strategy

 

Osaka Soda used the 1.5‐2℃ and 4℃ scenarios to identify risks associated with the transition to a decarbonized society (transition risks) and risks associated with physical impacts of global warming (physical risks), respectively.

Under the 1.5/2℃ scenario, transition risks are assumed to be relatively higher than physical risks, while under the 4℃ scenario, physical risks such as reduced capacity utilization and unstable resource supply due to frequent disasters such as typhoons and floods are assumed to be relatively higher.

Given this, OSAKA SODA has identified the following risks and opportunities related to climate change that are important to us, and has formulated action policies for these.

Risk/Opportunity Type

Period of Occurrence

Business Impact

Action Policy

Transition risks     

(※1)

Policies and regulations

Increased carbon price and other regulatory compliance costs

Short term

High

  • Introducing high-efficiency equipment
  • Promoting energy conservation activities
  • Streamlining production processes
  • Promoting use of green energy

Increased offset credit prices

Long term

High

Increased prices and difficulties in procurement of some materials due to regulations

Short term

Medium

  • Requesting and actively supporting decarbonization activities in the supply chain

Markets

Decreased demand for commercial products with high environmental impact

Short term

Medium

  • Studying low-carbon production processes

Physical risks        

(※2)

Acute

Decreased capacity utilization of business sites due to sudden disasters

Medium term

Medium

  • Upkeep of disaster prevention equipment, goods, and materials
  • Conducting disaster drills in anticipation of large-scale earthquakes, etc.
  • Reviewing BCP
  • Planned renewals of aging facilities

Stopped operations due to damage in the supply chain

Medium term

Medium

  • Implementing supply chain management for sustainable procurement

Unstable supply of natural resources, water, electricity, raw materials, etc.

Medium term

Medium

  • Diversifying raw material suppliers

Chronic

Medium term

Medium

Opportunites

Products and services

Increased subsidies for the development and implementation of environmentally friendly technologies

Short term

High

  • Developing materials reducing environmental impact and conserving energy by improving energy efficiency, extending service life, and eliminating solvents

Increased demand for materials, components, and solutions for environmentally friendly equipment

Short term

Medium

Captured business opportunities by developing environmentally friendly technologies ahead of competitors

Short term

Medium

Markets

Enhanced corporate image by promoting disclosure of climate-related information

Short term

Medium

  • Disclosing investment and development information for growth of environmentally friendly businesses
  1. Assumed to occur most significantly under the 1.5/2℃ scenario
  2. Assumed to occur most significantly under the 4℃ scenario, etc.

Risk Management

At Osaka Soda, appropriate response to climate change is an important issue and is discussed in the relevant departments. These discussions are regularly reported to the Board of Directors.

Metrics and Targets

Having selected greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a metric to evaluate climate change, we aim to reduce fiscal 2030 GHG emissions (total for Scope 1+2) 30% compared to fiscal 2013.

拡大

Fiscal 2023 GHG emissions(Scope1,2,3)

GHG emissions [thousand t-CO2e]

Scope 1

Direct emissions

52.8

Scope 2

Indirect emissions from energy sources

(Market-based)

224.5

(Location-based)

277.7

Scope 3

Other indirect emissions

326.9

GHG protocol

GHG emissions [thousand t-CO2e]

Category 1

Purchased goods and services

176.7

Category 2

Capital goods

18.5

Category 3

Fuel-and energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)

89.7

Category 4

Upstream transportation and distribution

39.4

Category 5

Waste generated in operations

1.5

Category 6

Business travel

0.5

Category 7

Employee commuting

0.6

Category 8

Upstream leased assets

ー ※1

Category 9

Downstream transportation and distribution

ー ※2

Category 10

Processing of sold products

ー ※2

Category 11

Use of sold products

ー ※2

Category 12

End-of-life treatment of sold products

ー ※2

Category 13

Downstream leased assets

Excluded※3

Category 14

Franchises

Excluded※3

Category 15

Investments

Excluded※3

*1 Not calculated since included in Scope 1 and 2

*2 Not calculated since it is difficult to collect activity data as they are used by many customers and for many purposes

*3 Excluded since target business is not conducted

【Emissions intensity used】

When calculating Scope 1 and 2 emissions, Osaka Soda uses coefficients from the Ministry of the Environment’s system for calculating, reporting, and making public GHG emissions. When calculating Scope 3 emissions, emission factors from IDEA Ver.3.4 or the Ministry of the Environment’s Emission Intensity Database For Calculating GHG Emissions Throughout the Supply Chain V3.4 are used.

【Scope of calculations】

Scope 1, 2: Osaka Soda Group domestic business sites

Scope 3 (categories 1, 2, 4, 6, 7): Osaka Soda domestic business sites

Scope 3 (categories 3, 5): Osaka Soda Group domestic business sites